|
|
General Simon Wong 31 Mar
|
|
General Simon Wong 27 Mar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Simon Wong 13 Mar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Simon Wong 29 Feb
|
|
|
|
General Simon Wong 18 Feb
|
|
General Simon Wong 4 Feb
|
|
|
|
General Simon Wong 22 Jan
Just as the global outlook brightens, Canadian households have gone wobbly, forcing the Bank of Canada to reassess its outlook, though not enough to change its benchmark interest rate.
Consumer spending slowed during the second half of 2019 and the trade wars haven’t calmed enough to offset the loss of Canada’s primary economic engine. The result is a significantly weaker short-term forecast that could prompt the central bank to cut interest rates if current conditions persist.
“There is some downside risk to the outlook for inflation,” Stephen Poloz, the bank’s governor, said at a press conference in Ottawa on Jan. 22. “I’m not saying the door is not open to an interest-rate cut. Obviously, it is. It is open. But it hinges on how the data evolve from here.”
[realted_links /]
Traders weren’t ready for a pivot from the Bank of Canada. The only thing they really got right about the latest policy announcement was that the benchmark rate would remain unchanged at 1.75 per cent. Otherwise, most assumed Poloz and his deputies would signal that they were content to muddle along. Ahead of the announcement, prices on securities linked to short-term interest rates put the odds of an interest-rate cut in 2020 at essentially nil.
That remains the most likely scenario. The jobless rate is about as low as it’s ever been, wages are rising and the housing market in most places is strong. No one is talking about a recession.
But the Bank of Canada could no longer ignore persistent signs of trouble. Business investment “appears to have weakened after a strong third quarter,” hiring “has slowed,” and consumer confidence and spending indicators “have been unexpectedly soft,” policy-makers said in their new policy statement.
They slashed their forecast for fourth-quarter growth to an annual rate of 0.3 per cent — stall speed. They foresee a recovery, predicting an expansion of 1.6 per cent in 2020 as business investment and exports gradually improve. That’s nothing to get excited about. The Bank of Canada also revised its estimate of the economy’s non-inflationary speed limit to two per cent.
The new outlook is one of underperformance, with room for stimulus. Traders now put the odds of an interest-rate increase this year at 50 per cent, according to RBC Capital Markets. The dollar dropped a cent against its U.S. counterpart, settling at around 76 cents U.S.
“Today’s dovish statement could turn out to be a game changer at some point,” said Sébastien Lavoie, chief economist at Laurentian Bank Securities.
Household spending on goods and services increased 0.4 per cent in the third quarter, an improvement from very little growth in the spring, but a poor result by historical standards, according to Statistics Canada’s most recent report on quarterly gross domestic product. (The average quarterly change dating back to 1961 is a 0.8 per cent increase.) The path of interest rates will depend on whether the rate of spending gets back to normal.
“Data for Canada indicate that growth in the near term will be weaker,” officials said in their policy statement. The slump could “signal that global economic conditions have been affecting Canada’s economy to a greater extent than was predicted,” they added. “Moreover, during the past year Canadians have been saving a larger share of their incomes, which could signal increased consumer caution.”
The possibility that debt will eventually weigh on consumption has been part of Poloz’s story from the beginning of his tenure almost seven years ago. Households took advantage of ultra-low interest rates and piled up debt after the financial crisis, just as central bankers hoped they would. But consumers were never expected to carry the economy for a decade. Eventually, the burden of all that debt would force them to tap out. Exports and business investment would have to take over.
The shift never really happened. Exports lagged the recovery from the Great Recession because there were too few companies left standing to take full advantage of resurgent global demand. The collapse of oil prices in 2014 and 2015 forced the Bank of Canada to keep interest rates low, and then the trade wars interrupted Poloz’s attempt to return rates back to a more normal setting. Strong hiring, outside of Alberta, and high levels of immigration kept consumption going, but there was always a risk that this dynamic would lose its force.
Nothing in the Bank of Canada’s latest round of communications suggests the economy is in serious trouble. Rather, the message is simply that there isn’t as much momentum as previously thought. Policy-makers last year said they would be watching for evidence that the trade wars were spreading beyond corporate decision making. Now, they said, they could be seeing some. Poloz told reporters that the analysis that led to the revised outlook brought a “crystallization of some of the domestic downside risks.”
If the headlines around trade continue to improve, consumer confidence could get better and spending along with it. Exports and business investment should slowly strengthen, which could forestall the need for stimulus. The Bank of Canada emphasized that it remains concerned about re-igniting a borrowing binge, while acknowledging that a higher savings rate would offset some of those concerns.
Ultimately, the central bank cares most about inflation, and weaker growth could bring deflationary pressure. “In determining the future path of the bank’s policy interest rate, Governing Council will be watching closely to see if the recent slowdown in growth is more persistent that forecast,” the statement said.
General Simon Wong 20 Jan
If you want to live downtown, you might feel like all your money is going towards a tiny shoebox. Meanwhile, if you are willing to sacrifice the location, you can get more bang for your buck. To help you out, we’ve made a list of what a $2,000 Metro Vancouver apartment looks like across the city.
As a local, it will come as no surprise that Vancouver is one of the most expensive places in Canada to live.
According to Rentals.ca rental report, the average one-bedroom in Vancouver in 2019 comes in just a few dollars below $2000. But, this number is forecasted to inflate to a jaw-dropping $2,585 per month by the end of 2020.
Thankfully, there are some areas in the city where you can find much cheaper rentals. As $2,000 can go much further in the suburbs than it can in the downtown core.
You might be surprised to see how much you can get for the same price as a downtown bachelor pad.
If you crave space for all your stuff, for the same price, you can get a newly renovated three-bedroom without adding too much time to your daily commute.
This is what you can get for less than $2000 a month right now in the different neighbourhoods:
Price: $1,800
Address: 1022 Nelson St., Vancouver, BC
Description: If you are willing to live without a bedroom, you can enjoy this sleek bachelor apartment right downtown.
Price: $1,600
Address: 11110 156A St., Surrey, BC
Description: This two-bedroom unit is inside a house. The neutrally decorated rental could be yours for just $1600, which also includes your utilities (heating, electricity, water), plus wifi.
Price: $1,850
Address: 4520 Union St., Burnaby, BC
Description: For under $2000, this 2-bedroom 850 square feet suite could be yours. It comes with in-unit laundry, and a new refrigerator and electric range cooktop.
Price: $1,895
Address: 10951 Mortfield Rd., Richmond, BC
Description: Are you tired of living in a tiny bachelor pad? If so, this three-bedroom rental will give you all the space you crave. While living here, you can also enjoy the outdoor pool, sauna, and exercise room.
Price: $1,795
Address: 13555 96 Ave., Surrey, BC
Description: This two-bedroom apartment has gorgeous finishing like a kitchen with a quartz countertop that you will love. The unit also comes with keyless entry, in-suite laundry, a dishwasher, along with access to the rooftop terrace.
Price: $1,700
Address: 21571 Stonehouse Ave., Maple Ridge, BC
Description: This newly built 850 square feet 2-bedroom rental is inside a house. It has a private entrance, modern kitchen, in-suite laundry, and parking.
Price: $1,800
Address: 515 Foster Ave., Coquitlam, BC
Description: You can move into this dreamy one-bedroom apartment that comes with a den perfect for a home office. It comes with a dishwasher, gas cooktop, and a stacked laundry unit. Plus, you’ll be able to enjoy the gym, steam room, sauna, library, screening room, pool, and sports court in the building.
Price: $1,910
Address: 151 East Keith Rd., North Vancouver, BC
Description: The apartment is located in the waterfront district, only a short walk from cafes and stores. The newly renovated unit includes hardwood floors, a kitchen with a eat up bar, and utilities (heating and water).
General Simon Wong 16 Jan
What can the most expensive real estate market in the world teach Vancouver about rental affordability?
Social entrepreneur Ricky Yu has an idea. In Hong Kong, he’s formed a network of landlords willing to rent out their apartments at a below-market rate to low-income single mothers who are vetted by his company.
And now, the 51-year old is considering expanding to B.C.’s Lower Mainland, and has already reached out to some individual property owners in B.C.
“I’m interested in introducing this program to other big cities especially Vancouver, because there’s a high proportion of Chinese that makes me feel easier.”
It’s a tempting success story, but one that might not sit well with B.C. laws which don’t allow the fixed-tenure leases his housing program, called Light Be, relies on. The program also requires tenants to undergo a series of personal development programs that train them to become economically self-sufficient — something a Vancouver politician criticizes for being too exclusive.
Yu is a multinational company executive turned CEO of Hong Kong social enterprise Light Be, a for-profit company that aims to achieve social outcomes and reinvests its profits in its operation.
His 10-year-old company’s social housing initiative, called Light Home Scheme, has been called “highly commendable” by the Hong Kong government in addressing the shortage of low-rent housing there. A Hong Kong NGO launched a similar program two years ago.
Prospective Light Home tenants, who must be single mothers with children, are referred by Hong Kong government social workers. Light Be’s staff then vet applicants via interviews or home visits. Yu also reviews each application. Tenants commit to personal development programs as part of the tenancy terms.
The benefit for tenants is rent that’s 60 to 80 per cent below market rate, depending on each mother’s finances.
Light Be makes its money by taking a variable percentage of the rent paid to landlords, and is sponsored by two charitable foundations affiliated with prominent real estate developers in Hong Kong.
Yu says he doesn’t need to reach out to landlords of the otherwise-vacant apartments — they call him.
“Actually they could call us every month non-stop.”
Landlords do not receive any tax breaks in Hong Kong for joining the Light Be network.
Yu said some Canadians living in B.C. are already part of the network of landlords who lease their vacant Hong Kong apartments with Light Be. Many are “concerned about the social problems and try to do something and contribute to the low income citizens,” said Yu.
Also, “they need an agent to make good use of their apartments,” he said.
The latest Hong Kong government data shows a 4.3 per cent vacancy rate in private housing compared to a one per cent vacancy rate in Lower Mainland apartments.
It’s an idea that B.C. property investors have discussed before, said William Blake, a co-owner of more than 1,000 residential units across B.C.
“We have quite a few people who were originally from Hong Kong … and we have talked about Light Be and other programs like that,” he said.
Blake said there are lots of landlords in B.C. who would be willing to lower their rents “to help those who fall through the cracks,” but he feels landlords get inadequate protection from the government if tenants refuse to pay or damage the homes.
The property investor said he hopes Light Be comes to Canada because of the vetting and protection it provides to landlords.
Light Be requires tenants to move out after three years. Yu said his social enterprise has never accepted “alumni” to reapply.
“Before they move out, they should’ve significantly changed their lifestyles, and live in a financially … more sustainable manner,” he said.
But those same terms that might feel like protection to landlords look “exclusive” to Vancouver Coun. Jean Swanson.
Moving after three years isn’t good for a family, and people with mental health issues will have a hard time getting into a program similar to Light Be, she said.
“Housing should be a basic human right,” said the longtime advocate for affordable housing.
The idea gets an even firmer ‘no’ from the B.C. government.
“Landlords could not include a maximum length for tenure as fixed-term leases are no longer allowed in B.C.,” said the B.C. Ministry of
Richmond Coun. Carol Day, who applauds Light Be, said the ministry should look at the Hong Kong initiative’s fixed tenure “through a different lens.”
“This is not an ordinary landlord-renter situation … it is a charitable arrangement,” said Day. She said fixed-term leases should also apply to modular housing.
Andy Yan, urban planning professor of Simon Fraser University, said Light Homes are a form of transitional housing that may work for populations in B.C. who try to “develop a level of stability in their lives,” such as youth who are just out of the government care system, newcomers or certain ethnocultural communities, but this housing program does not address the problem of housing security for senior tenants with declining incomes.
Thom Armstrong, executive director of the Co-operative Housing Federation of B.C., said Light Be’s private approach is a “realistic response” to insufficient government investment on housing, but the initiative is unlikely to reach a large enough scale to have an impact.
Across Hong Kong, there are 120 Light Homes compared to over 780,000 public rental housing units.
Yu is optimistic: “We expect ourselves [to] continue to grow about 100 per cent every three years.”
But he acknowledges there are limitations, saying Light Be “is not trying to address all housing, poverty and inequality issues.” He says Light Be will conduct a feasibility study on how to adjust Light Home Scheme in compliance with B.C. laws.
Yan said a pilot study would be needed to measure the social and economic outcomes of the program.
General Simon Wong 15 Jan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|