Download My Mortgage Toolbox!

Month: April 2019

Here’s What The Bank Of Canada Says Is The Real Reason For The Housing Slowdown.

General Simon Wong 29 Apr

Here’s What The Bank Of Canada Says Is The Real Reason For The Housing Slowdown

Don’t blame government policy. We kind of did this to ourselves.

Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz, right, listens to senior deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins during a news conference in Ottawa on July 13, 2016.

Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz, right, listens to senior deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins during a news conference in Ottawa on July 13, 2016.

MONTREAL — For months now, the real estate industry has been telling us that Canada’s mortgage stress test is the primary cause of the housing slowdown in Greater Toronto and Greater Vancouver.

The test is never far from the top of any real estate board press release announcing another decline in home sales, and groups like Mortgage Professionals Canada have warned that the rule risks shutting an entire generation out of home ownership.

They’re calling on the government to remove or loosen the test, which requires borrowers to qualify at an interest rate two percentage points higher than the one they’re being offered.

But a report issued by the Bank of Canada (BoC) paints a very different picture of what happened in the overheated real estate markets around Toronto and Vancouver over the past several years.

The report never uses the word “bubble,” preferring the more neutral-sounding term “froth,” but it paints a clear picture of housing markets where excessive enthusiasm led to runaway house price growth, followed by the inevitable snap-back once there weren’t enough buyers to keep the party going.

And while the mortgage stress test did play a role, it was a minor one, the BoC concluded.

A lot of things happened in 2016 and 2017 to slow down what was at the time an overheated housing market:

  • British Columbia and Ontario introduced foreign buyers’ taxes
  • Canada’s banking regulator, OSFI, progressively toughened mortgage lending rules
  • The Bank of Canada began raising interest rates.

To get an idea of just which of these changes actually affected housing, and how, the BoC’s analysts analyzed “loan-level micro data to decompose movements in housing resales.” In other words, they attempted to track the actual flow of money through mortgage markets, to see how each change successively affected people’s decisions.

What they found was a housing market where prices grew way out of affordability range for buyers. Between 2015 and 2018, the rising cost of home ownership would have lowered annual home sales nationwide by a hefty 56,000, the BoC’s report estimated.

Only a fraction of that — 10,000 sales — would have been due to the mortgage stress test, the bank found. All the rest would have been due to rising prices and hikes to mortgage rates.

But Canada got lucky: The affordability crisis happened about the same time as a jobs boom, which pushed up incomes and increased demand for housing by almost enough to offset the jump in home ownership costs. Hence, a housing slowdown, but no bust.

The BoC flagged another classic sign of a housing bubble: Around 2015 and 2016, Toronto and Vancouver saw a spike in home sales, well beyond what you would expect at that level of employment and income. The increase in sales in that time was 10 times as large as it should have been, given economic conditions, the BoC estimated.

Bank of Canada
The Bank of Canada’s research shows that home sales, led primarily by Toronto and Vancouver, were excessively high during the 2015-2016 period, and now have fallen to levels below where they should be.

“Much of the previous strength in resale activity was influenced by extrapolative expectations. … These expectations quickly faded following the policy measures,” the report stated.

In other words, people panicked. Expecting house prices to keep growing rapidly, they jumped into the market as soon as they could, and so further pushed up prices and home sales.

Then, when new taxes and mortgage rules took hold, expectations went from too optimistic to too pessimistic. Sales fell below where they should be, given economic fundamentals, and that’s where they remain today.

Much as we’d like to blame foreign buyers or government policy, it seems we kind of did this to ourselves.

“The housing market is currently in uncharted territory.”Bank of Canada, “Disentangling the Factors Driving Housing Resales,” April 2019

And a rapid rebound seems unlikely. The BoC’s report suggests sales will likely remain sluggish until prices align better with incomes.

But so far, affordability isn’t improving, or at least not much. Prices remain elevated even as sales remain weak, and a recent study from Zoocasa highlighted how extreme the problem has become: It estimates only the top 2.5 per cent of Vancouver’s earners, and the top 10 per cent of Toronto’s earners, could afford a detached home today. Only the top 25 per cent of earners in these cities can even afford a condo.

And, with household debt hitting yet another record high at the end of 2018, BoC deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins expects consumers to keep hitting the brakes on spending.

The Canadian Press
Bank of Canada senior deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins at a news conference in Ottawa on Jan. 17, 2018.

“When consumers are highly indebted — and yes, it’s a major vulnerability, it’s the number one financial vulnerability for the Canadian economy — at some point households may start to say, ‘I need to increase my savings’,” Wilkins told reporters at a press conference on Wednesday.

What that means for the housing market going forward is hard to guess, and even the Bank of Canada isn’t willing to go out on a limb. With new taxes and new mortgage rules working their way through the system, and high debt levels supported by a booming job market, we’ve got a brew on our hands no one has ever quite seen before.

The BoC’s report sums it up neatly, if not reassuringly: “The housing market is currently in uncharted territory.”

Millennials earn more than their parents did — but owe a lot more.

General Simon Wong 22 Apr

Millennials earn more than their parents did — but owe a lot more

Cost of housing a major factor, making bigger gap between rich and poor young people today

The gap between the richest and poorest millennials is wider than it was for previous generations, new figures from Statistics Canada show.

Millennials make more money than previous generations in that demographic cohort, but are also saddled with much more debt, even adjusted for inflation, according to new Statistics Canada data that confirms what has been long suspected.

The data agency analyzed income, wealth and debt levels for different Canadian generations over various time frames to see how they are doing, compared to each other.

Among the main takeaways in the report are young people are wealthier than previous generations were at the same point in their lives.

For the purposes of this study, Statistics Canada considered millennials to be between 25 and 34 years old in 2016. The agency then compared them with the same age group in 1999 (generation X) and young people in 1984 who are today’s baby boomers.

The millennial cohort had a median after-tax household income of $44,093 in 2016, by Statistics Canada’s calculations. That compares with $33,276 for gen-Xers and $33,350 for boomers at the same age. And those figures are inflation adjusted, which means it’s an apples-to-apples comparison.

But while their incomes were higher on the whole, their overall debt loads were much higher for the most recent generation.

Education costs are one reason. Almost three-quarters of millennials pursue some sort of higher education after high school, higher than the just over half of gen-Xers who did. And almost a quarter of them carried student debt in 2016 with a median value of $12,000.

“This compares to 14.8 per cent and $9,675 for generation-X families at the same age in 1999,” Statistics Canada said.

Financial counsellor Jessica Moorhouse says education has become a double-edged sword: it’s seen as key to ensuring wealth, but also costs more to obtain — and comes with no guarantees of a high-paying job as a result.

‘Even though we’re making more money, there’s a lot more things we have to pay for,’ millennial money expert Jessica Moorhouse says. (John Grierson/ CBC News)

“When we grew up, we were given a blueprint for how to be a successful adult based on what our parents did,” she says, rattling off the typical path of working hard in school so you can get into college, because that sets you up to get a good job for life with a pension.

“But we did all those things and none of it worked,” she said. “The whole game changed.”

Home ownership is also seen as key to wealth generation for millennials, and there, too, it’s playing out in the current generation being more indebted than the previous one.

The median mortgage level for a homeowning millennial was $218,000 in 2016, Statistics Canada said — more than 2.5 times the average annual income for a young family who owned a home that year.

For the previous generation, the typical mortgage at that age was $117,481. For boomers, it was $67,802 — barely more than the typical after-tax income of $64,800 for a young family owning a home.

“Higher values for principal residences mainly explain the increases in net worth from one generation to the next, yet these were also coupled with more mortgage debt,” Statistics Canada said.

Income inequality getting worse too

The impact of house prices on millennial wealth levels is so large that it’s causing a wider than usual gulf within the same generation — between those who own their homes, and those who don’t.

Millennials aged 30 to 34 who owned a home in 2016 were worth $261,900 on average. Those who didn’t, however, had a net worth of just $18,400. Only eight per cent of millennial renters had net worth greater than the median net worth of homeowners in the same age group, Statistics Canada said.

The old rules of generating wealth don’t work the way they used to, Moorhouse says.

Not surprisingly, millennials in Toronto and Vancouver are, on the whole, much richer than their peers in other parts of Canada, largely because of higher house prices among the lucky few who’ve managed to buy in.

That’s why millennials are often told it makes financial sense to move to smaller cities with cheaper real estate, but Moorhouse notes those cities also generally come with much lower salaries and worse job markets, which negates some of those theoretical benefits.

House prices are a big factor in widening the income gap within the current generation, too. The poorest 25 per cent of Canadian millennials were worth $9,500 each in 2016, while the richest quarter of them were worth $253,900.

A generation ago, that gap was much smaller, from $6,220 for the poorest slice of gen-Xers to a net worth of $126,900 for the richest.

To Moorhouse, the widening gap between rich and poor is one of the most interesting parts of the data.

“There’s less of a middle class in this millennial world. That’s where we’re going, because even though we’re making more money, there’s a lot more things we have to pay for.”

A closer look at the taxes that sent Vancouver’s luxury housing market reeling.

General Simon Wong 18 Apr

A closer look at the taxes that sent Vancouver’s luxury housing market reeling

Vancouver is buckling under a slew of regulations introduced since 2016 to tame years of relentless growth that made the city the most unaffordable on the continent

 

Vancouver’s housing market is buckling under a slew of taxes and regulations introduced since 2016 to tame years of relentless growth that made the city the most unaffordable on the continent.

The high end felt the impact first and has been the hardest hit: prices in West Vancouver, Canada’s richest neighbourhood, are down 17 per cent from their 2016 peak. The slowdown is now broadening: home sales in March were the weakest since the financial crisis and benchmark prices fell 8.5 per cent from their record last June.

 

 

It’s become more costly to both buy and own expensive homes, particularly for non-resident investors and foreigners. To get a sense of the impact from the municipal, provincial and federal measures, take as a hypothetical example, the province’s most valuable property: the $73.12 million (US$55 million) house belonging to Vancouver-based Lululemon Athletica Inc. founder Chip Wilson. A foreign purchaser of the home who leaves the property empty for much of the year would end up paying as much as $20.8 million in taxes as follows:

Taxes on purchase:

Foreign buyers’ tax of 20 per cent: $14.6 million surcharge on top of sales price

Property transfer tax rate climbs to 5 per cent on most expensive homes: $3.7 million

 

Ownership taxes:

Municipal vacancy tax of 1 per cent on assessed value: $731,200 a year

Provincial speculation and vacancy tax, 2 per cent of assessed value: $1.46 million a year

Provincial luxury home tax known as the additional school tax of 0.2 per cent to 0.4 per cent of assessed value: $278,480 a year

 

Additional government moves:

Federal rules tightening mortgage lending made it harder to obtain larger mortgages and harder for foreign buyers to borrow.

Proposed legislation will expose anonymous Vancouver property owners in a public registry to stymie tax evasion, fraud and money laundering.

High lease prices driving Metro Vancouver’s industrial innovation.

General Simon Wong 11 Apr

Hungerford Properties is considering a multi-storey industrial project at a site it bought on Southwest Marine Drive in Vancouver a year ago when the site was valued at $24.3 million. The three-acre parcel is now assessed at $44.3 million | Submitted

Industrial real estate specialist Bruno Fiorvento recently received a three-letter reply when he sent lease cost estimates to a U.S. client trying to acquire 80,000 square feet of Metro Vancouver industrial space.

The client had scrawled “WTF” on the returned, unsigned contract, Fiorvento told an industrial panel he moderated during the Vancouver Real Estate Forum on April 4.

“[The client] said he was taking his business elsewhere,” said Fiorvento, executive vice-president at broker Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL).

That’s the type of response industrial developers are trying to avoid as they grapple with a 200 per cent spike in land costs and a 387 per cent surge in lease rates in the past two years.

Metro Vancouver now has Canada’s highest industrial land costs – up to and over $10 million an acre in Vancouver and Burnaby – and the highest industrial lease prices at an average of $12.46 per square foot. Industrial strata costs also lead the country, at $350 per square foot on average and cresting over $1,000 per square foot in Vancouver.

The answer is densification, the industrial panel agreed, but getting more industrial space on the same amount of land poses political and cost challenges.

For two of Vancouver’s most active industrial developers, multi-storey industrial and industrial mixed with residential rentals is seen as a possible solution.

PC Urban, which has turned a number of older Metro industrial sites into four-storey light industrial/office space, is taking the concept into heavier-grade industrial with a new project in East Vancouver.

The 120,000-square-foot Interurban Evolution project, on Vernon Drive near the north end of Clarke Drive, will have three floors of industrial and include three freight elevators and a trio of loading docks. The fourth floor will be office space, said Brent Sawchyn, principal of PC Urban.

An automotive body repair firm has bought the 30,000-square-foot ground floor-space and the top floors are being sold at from $750 to $900 per square foot.

Sawchyn said this price is about 40 per cent less than what similar stacked light industrial is selling for in Vancouver’s Mount Pleasant area.

Panel member Tegan Smith, director of planning at Hungerford Properties, said that getting political sign-off on industrial projects is already hard and that trying to get three levels of government – and often a First Nation – on board with an innovative concept would make it even more difficult. She pointed to a 140-acre site in Abbotsford where Hungerford is seeking approval from Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the province, the local municipality and two Indigenous bands for a conventional industrial project.

“Politics and policy are adding to delays and cost,” she said.

But policy can also work in an industrial developer’s favour, as Hungerford attempts a first for Metro Vancouver: a stacked, mixed-use strata industrial-office project topped with more than 100 units of rental housing, which it plans to develop with QuadReal.

The False Creek Flats site at East First Avenue and Main Street falls under specific City of Vancouver zoning, said Michael Hungerford, a partner in Hungerford Properties.

The land is allowed a floor-space ratio (FSR) of 6.0 for the industrial/commercial and 3.5 FSR for the residential.

While aimed at light industrial users, Hungerford said, it would include freight elevators and loading docks.

Smith noted that Metro suburban municipalities, all of which she said are trying to balance more employment space with a dwindling supply of industrial land, are becoming receptive to industrial innovation, from higher density to mixed use.

 

Five things to watch for in the Canadian business world this week.

General Simon Wong 8 Apr

Five things to watch for in the Canadian business world this week

Ontario Cannabis Store

 

Housing starts

CMHC releases its latest read on the Canadian housing market on Monday when it publishes its preliminary data on housing starts for March. The annual pace of housing starts cooled in February as higher mortgage rates and less stimulative economic conditions helped soften demand.

 

Cogeco earnings

Cogeco and Cogeco Communications issue second-quarter results on Tuesday. The Montreal-based cable and internet company signed a deal in February to sell struggling Cogeco Peer 1 Inc. six years after purchasing it.

 

Scotia AGM

The Bank of Nova Scotia will hold its annual meeting of shareholders on Tuesday in Toronto. The CEOs of three of Scotiabank’s rivals said last week that they expect muted economic growth, a slower spring housing market and have concerns about the country’s future prosperity, but expressed confidence in their ability to navigate any rough patches ahead.

 

Shaw results

Shaw Communications will release second-quarter results on Tuesday. Shaw’s subsidiary Freedom Mobile drew the fifth-highest number of consumer complaints, after Bell, Rogers, Cogeco and Telus, according to a recent report by Canada’s telecommunications and television service.

 

Pot stats

Statistics Canada releases its StatsCannabis data availability on Wednesday. The agency said that the average price of a legal gram of medical or non-medical weed during the fourth quarter last year was $9.70, compared to the black market price of $6.51.

Canadian Mortgage Rates Are Being Pushed Lower by Slowing U.S. Momentum.

General Simon Wong 2 Apr

Canadian Mortgage Rates Are Being Pushed Lower by

Canadian fixed mortgage rates have been on a steady downward march of late.

Their decline has been underpinned by softening domestic economic data, which have pushed down Government of Canada (GoC) bond yields, on which our fixed mortgage rates are priced. Our weakening economic backdrop has also made the Bank of Canada (BoC) more dovish about its plans to hike its overnight rate, on which our variable mortgage rates are priced.

While our own slowing economic momentum has been the primary driver of our falling bond yields and mortgage rates, changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve’s outlook are also contributing to their recent drop. That’s because we sell about 80% of our exports into U.S. markets, and on a comparative basis, our provinces trade more with their U.S. neighbours to the south than they do with each other.

Here is a summary of the recent U.S. developments that are helping to put downward pressure on our bond yields, and by association, our mortgage rates:

  • The Fed made it clear that it is done hiking rates for the time being. At its policy-rate meeting on March 20, it noted that “growth of economic activity has slowed from its solid rate in the fourth quarter” and that “indicators point to slower growth of housing spending and business investment in the first quarter”. On a related note, last week the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis lowered its initial estimate of U.S. fourth quarter annualized GDP growth from 2.6% to 2.2% (which was down from 3.4% in the third quarter).
  • At the Fed’s January meeting, the median forecast from its members, who vote on policy-rate changes, was for two rate hikes in 2019. At its latest meeting, that median forecast was revised to no rate increases in 2019 and one increase in 2020.
  • U.S. bond-market investors are even more bearish. The U.S. yield curve has now inverted, which means that 3-month U.S. Treasury Bills now offer higher yields than 10-year U.S. Treasuries. An inverted U.S. yield curve is a worrying signal because on a historical basis, a U.S. recession has followed within one year of inversion 85% of the time. (FYI, the Canadian yield curve also inverted recently, but it is not as reliable a predictor of Canadian recessions.) Not surprisingly, the U.S. bond futures market is now betting that the Fed’s next move will be a cut.
  • In November 2017 the Fed began to reduce its massive $4.5 trillion balance sheet by allowing $50 billion worth of expiring Treasury securities to roll off its balance sheet each month. This was another form of monetary-policy tightening because it put upward pressure on U.S. Treasury yields as each $50 billion tranche had to be absorbed by the broader bond market. In late 2018, Fed Chair Powell said that this program would continue on auto-pilot, but as U.S. financial conditions tightened sharply shortly thereafter, he quickly backtracked on that statement. At its March 20 meeting, the Fed said that it would slow its monthly balance-sheet reductions to $30 billion in May and stop them altogether by October.
  • Fed officials are now talking about a concept called “inflation targeting” which basically means that the Fed would allow inflation to exceed its 2% target after an extended period of below-target inflation in order to ensure that longer-term inflation expectations remained anchored at 2%. If the Fed is willing to allow inflation to run hot, at least temporarily, that further reduces the likelihood of additional Fed rate hikes over the short and medium term.

Interestingly, none of the Fed’s voting members is calling for a rate cut yet. As with the BoC, the Fed prefers to shift its outlook incrementally, over several meetings. Nonetheless, there is no question that its outlook has become decidedly more dovish of late.

So how is this impacting Canadian bond yields and mortgage rates?

The Canadian economy came through the 2008 financial crisis remarkably well, but our growth was largely fuelled by a rise in consumer spending that was underpinned by a massive increase in our overall household-debt levels. Going forward, five recent BoC rate increases and seven rounds of prudent mortgage rule changes make it unlikely that consumer spending will continue to drive our economic momentum.

Instead, the BoC is forecasting/hoping that export growth will fuel a rise in business investment and that these factors will combine to fill the void that slowing consumer spending leaves behind (even though when taken together, they only account for about half of what consumer spending contributes to our overall GDP). For that to have any chance of happening, we need the Loonie to be priced at levels that make our exports competitive. Bluntly put, if the BoC raises rates while the Fed stands pat, or if the Fed starts cutting and the BoC remains on hold, the Loonie would soar higher against the Greenback and intensify an existing headwind that will hammer our exporters.

Against that backdrop, the BoC’s monetary policy needs to track the Fed’s policy closely. Bond market investors know this, and that’s why the Fed’s dovish shift is helping to put downward pressure on our bond yields.

Side note: All that said, last Friday gave us a reminder that macroeconomic trends don’t typically move in a straight line. We learned that Canadian GDP grew by 0.3% on a month-over-month basis in January, which was well above the consensus estimate of 0.1%. That was unequivocally good news, and to be clear, I would trade an economic expansion and higher mortgage rates for slowing economic momentum and lower mortgage rates any day of the week.

What falling bond yields, the BoC, and the Fed are signalling shouldn’t be taken as good news just because it is likely to push mortgage rates lower. In such an instance, cheaper borrowing costs will offer only a silver lining to the dark economic clouds ahead.

Rate Table (April 1, 2019)

The Bottom Line: The U.S. Federal Reserve has sounded much more dovish of late, and that, coupled with reduced economic momentum in Canada, has helped push our bond yields, and by association, our fixed mortgage rates lower. Furthermore, if the Fed is done hiking rates, our export dependence on U.S. markets will ensure that the BoC is done hiking too. That means that our variable mortgage rates, like our fixed rates, aren’t likely to head higher any time soon.